Dialogues in Process Education is a monthly topic sheet that offers up four thought-provoking articles for discussion. With six months worth of content to explore, the chances are good that there's something there to pique your interest and motivate you to join in the dialogues. Here are some highlights from the most recent issue:

Teaching, Larning, & Environment: Shifting Perspectives

  The characteristics that are typically seen as either Faculty-centered, Learner-centered, or attributable to the Learning Environment are far more interchangeable than we tend to think. As a facilitator of learning, if you're working to create students who Accept responsibility of choice (which is a Learner-centered characteristic), then the correlating characteristics are Soliciting input (Faculty-centered) and Consensus building (Learning Environment). The ability to shift perspectives in this way is key to moving from one-on-one relationships to building a community of self-directed learners.

Getting Out of the Cave

  A powerful video adaptation of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" sets the stage for a discussion on the limits of traditional pedagogical methods. It asks how we free our students (and ourselves) to do more than watch 'shadows on the wall' and begin learning from the real world.

Belief vs. Alief

  Where beliefs are attitudes that we hold in response to how things actually are, aliefs are more primitive resonses to how things seem. For example, while we may know that the observation platform of a skyscraper is safe (we believe it is), our response to actually stepping out onto that platform is dictated by what our senses and fears (rather than our reason) tell us. This article explores the notion of an alief, applying it to learning situations where students exhibit unreasonable assumptions and misconceptions — aliefs   and asks how separating beliefs from aliefs might give us an advantage in helping students make the critical shift from being constrained by their aliefs to empowered by their beliefs.

Teacher Evaluations and Student Success

  We excerpt an study published in the Journal of Political Economy that examines the correlation between student evaluations (of teachers) and grades. The study states that "professors who excel at promoting contemporaneous student achievement teach in ways that improve their student evaluations but harm the follow-on achievement of their students in more advanced classes..." The question of how we invest in student evaluations and what we can take from them is a hot topic, to be sure!

These four articles are typical of each issue of Dialogues. Our goal is to poke, prod, test, try, question, introduce, play devil's advocate, and wonder how clothed the emperors of education really are. This is not a top-down, authoritative publication but rather an arena where we use the lens of Process Education to look at the theories and practices of education. Very little is off-limits — especially not our own favorite paradigms and practices!

If you're interested in learning more, experiencing a sample issue,

or subscribing to Dialogues, simply click anywhere in the image below.